<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s OK to say &#8220;no&#8221; to publishing &#8211; or at least &#8220;not yet&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/</link>
	<description>News from the Staff of Podiobooks.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Emery</title>
		<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question...  Let&#039;s say that an author wants to get the filtering and feedback that an editor can provide to strengthen the book before publishing it, BUT the author would prefer to self-publish via the many distribution options on the net like podiobooks.com.  What should that author do?  How could the author wind up like Mr. Sigler with Earthcore, having a professionally edited and revised book but still get to self-publish?  (This is hypothetical.  I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s what I am planning on doing.)  
Thanks for your time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question&#8230;  Let&#8217;s say that an author wants to get the filtering and feedback that an editor can provide to strengthen the book before publishing it, BUT the author would prefer to self-publish via the many distribution options on the net like podiobooks.com.  What should that author do?  How could the author wind up like Mr. Sigler with Earthcore, having a professionally edited and revised book but still get to self-publish?  (This is hypothetical.  I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s what I am planning on doing.)<br />
Thanks for your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aram</title>
		<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>Aram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2006/08/30/its-ok-to-say-no-to-publishing/#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, these days - probably all days - there is no way to know what books are going to catch on; and plenty of less than sterling works become huge hits. Publishers are filters, but their focus is on the bottom line - or rather, their predictions of the bottom line. There are plenty of books out there which should find no audience, and yet do. So I am grateful for online publishing - it opens the door for everyone. See Tom Friedman&#039;s &quot;The World Is Flat&quot;. The author makes a judgment that the book is ready; maybe it is and maybe it isn&#039;t, but it&#039;s up to the public to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, these days &#8211; probably all days &#8211; there is no way to know what books are going to catch on; and plenty of less than sterling works become huge hits. Publishers are filters, but their focus is on the bottom line &#8211; or rather, their predictions of the bottom line. There are plenty of books out there which should find no audience, and yet do. So I am grateful for online publishing &#8211; it opens the door for everyone. See Tom Friedman&#8217;s &#8220;The World Is Flat&#8221;. The author makes a judgment that the book is ready; maybe it is and maybe it isn&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s up to the public to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

