<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof of growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/</link>
	<description>News from the Staff of Podiobooks.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evo</title>
		<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Evo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Little growing red lines as in little growing red lines! :)

Though each stats package reports things differently, I&#039;m assuming that &quot;# reqs&quot; equates to &quot;hits&quot; (a very useless number, interesting only in the comparative) and &quot;# pages&quot; is the same as &quot;page views&quot;. Which is just as pointless, as the majority of the activity on the site is from RSS aggregators.

I need to chat with Tee and Chris about revealing additional numbers. I&#039;m 100% for full disclosure and transparency, but there are lies, damn lies and statistics in this world. When I put out &quot;numbers&quot; (no, the chart above does not count) about subscribers, I want to make sure it&#039;s defensible and not open to interpretation.

Give us some time to have confidence in the numbers, and we&#039;ll put them out, OK CP? Your comments, as always, are most appreciated.

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little growing red lines as in little growing red lines! <img src='http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Though each stats package reports things differently, I&#8217;m assuming that &#8220;# reqs&#8221; equates to &#8220;hits&#8221; (a very useless number, interesting only in the comparative) and &#8220;# pages&#8221; is the same as &#8220;page views&#8221;. Which is just as pointless, as the majority of the activity on the site is from RSS aggregators.</p>
<p>I need to chat with Tee and Chris about revealing additional numbers. I&#8217;m 100% for full disclosure and transparency, but there are lies, damn lies and statistics in this world. When I put out &#8220;numbers&#8221; (no, the chart above does not count) about subscribers, I want to make sure it&#8217;s defensible and not open to interpretation.</p>
<p>Give us some time to have confidence in the numbers, and we&#8217;ll put them out, OK CP? Your comments, as always, are most appreciated.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloysterpete</title>
		<link>http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloysterpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiobooks.com/blog/2005/10/31/proof-of-growth/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Pages is page views right?, so whats the req mean?. How many people have you got registered then Evo?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pages is page views right?, so whats the req mean?. How many people have you got registered then Evo?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

